From the warm-up room, Lilly King watched her fellow
competitor, Yulia Efimova, win a qualifying
heat. Efimova had been busted
for doping months before and almost excluded from the games. But she wasn’t, and she won her heat, and in
her celebration, wagged her finger in confidence.
The culturally-acceptable response to this gesture would
have been for King to silently ignore it, quietly prepare for the finals,
defeat her opponent in battle, and then calmly accept the win with unspoken
pride. That would have been satisfying.
But her response instead was to wag her finger back at that
screen, call out the competitor for this brazen act that disgraced her sport,
keep the pressure on for a whole day, beat her solidly in the race, and wag her
finger in victory as a sign to the world that we needn’t worry: cheaters
weren’t going to win on her watch. It
was bold, raised eyebrows, and may have crossed over the edge of good
sportsmanship. But it was even more
satisfying.
In fraternity life, we have silent warriors ethically
leading their fraternities without any boasting. Meanwhile, arrogant organizations that are
disgracing the movement with their acceptance of hazing, binge drinking, and
other damaging behaviors run rampant like poster children for Total Frat Move. In essence, cheating their way through and
wagging their finger as if they accomplished something profound.
And the good fraternities – those that are trying to live
their values – know they are there. They
know the “cheating” that’s taking place.
But what’s valued is to stoically fight wrong behaviors with right ones,
and to politely ignore the cheaters. Just go about our business and take care of
our own house.
Perhaps the time to be stoic has passed. Maybe the choice to stay silent is the wrong
one. Perhaps King upended our notions
that it should all just be solved in the field of play.
Perhaps it’s time to answer their wagging fingers with our
own. For those men and women who are doing it right to step forward, and
essentially tell those that aim to disgrace the institution we hold dear to eff off.
When will enough be
enough? All of the talk, education, and
planning done by national offices and campus staff means nothing if the
undergraduates don’t step forward and own the future of their fraternities.
And that can be done quietly or with swagger. Quietly doesn’t seem to be working for the
most part. Maybe we should give swagger a fighting chance.
This means that IFC meetings shouldn’t just be polite
passings of updates and announcements, but rather, poignant and free
discussions on the challenges facing the greater community. And thus,
uncomfortable for the cheaters.
It means that when you see something, say something. Not with a whisper, but with a wham. No great movements ever whispered their way
to victory.
Now, tact does matter.
Lilly King didn’t storm up to her competitor and fill her face full of
expletives and spittle. But her opinion
was made clear nonetheless and with force.
If you believe in fraternity and the sanctity of this movement, and you
are aware that there are those attempting to dismantle it through their words
and deeds, then ask yourself if your feelings are apparent to others. And if not, why are you hiding them?
It’s the launch of the Fall semester, and there is no better
time to take back our fraternity movement.
Let’s do it with attitude. The
time for finger-wagging is now.
I loved this moment from the Olympics. I also loved how she talked about it in the interview after she won. She didn't back track but addressed it head on. And just like some fraternities and sororities, the Russian swimmer got caught an astounding 5 times, yet this one time she didn't get caught so she got the same opportunity as those following the rules. We as advisors are like the Olympic committee who lets chapters continue to violate policy but still be a part of the community. What message does that send to students to encourage them to addredd wrongs?
ReplyDelete